This guide explains the evidence and its limitations. Exact detection rules and thresholds are private. Read each scan's units, timestamp and warnings; a percentage describes a measured holding or funding share, not a guarantee. Current CEX units: of total supply; cluster units: of total supply.
Shared fee settings can reveal coordinated wallets.
Every trade pays a base gas fee plus a priority fee the trader sets. Bot operators run all their wallets through one terminal with one fee configuration, so their wallets pay the exact same fee. Luminos groups the top holders by that shared fee fingerprint and shows how much supply each group controls. The fee shown for each group is the priority fee — the same number trading apps like pump.fun display — so you can match it against what you see in your own app.
Which trading terminal each wallet uses.
Terminals (Axiom, Trojan, gmgn, Photon, BullX) each route their fee to a distinct on-chain address, so we can tell which one a wallet trades through and tag it with a colored badge. The Accounts section sums this up: what share of the analyzed wallets — and of supply — sits on each terminal.
Read the result together with any supporting evidence and data warnings.
The header shows the result (Bundled / Cabaled / Organic / Unverified). Where applicable, it also shows a confidence label. A Bundled result also carries a small Fully tag when a single check settles it on its own — a hard trigger, or one of the exchange-funding lines described below. Only Bundled ever shows a tag.
Organic means the token passed the Bundled and Cabaled checks with reliable exchange-funding data. It does not need extra positive signals to qualify. Any genuine data limitations or other risk warnings are shown separately. It is not a guarantee of safety.
Unverified means the analysis could not grade the coin, for one of two reasons: it has no real market yet (almost no liquidity, few holders, barely any trades), or exchange-funding data was unavailable so bundling couldn't be checked. One important rule: a coin that would have been Organic is downgraded to grey Unverified whenever the exchange-funding data is unreliable — the tool refuses to hand out a clean blue result it can't stand behind. The banner says it plainly: not a clean bill of health. Missing data only ever pushes toward caution, never away from it — a Bundled or Cabaled result earned from other signals is never softened by it.
How much data backed the result.
High / medium / low describes the available supporting data. Thin history or an unavailable source can limit confidence even when an observed pattern is clear. Read data warnings separately from the classification.
How much supply traces back to exchange withdrawals, and which exchanges it came through.
We examine how holder funding is distributed across exchanges and linked wallets. The total and the mix provide context; exchange use alone does not establish coordination. A funding trail is an observation about transactions, not proof that wallets share an owner.
Cluster supply vs Partition. The funding panel has a toggle. Cluster supply can add up to more than 100% because one wallet can trace to several exchanges and is counted under each. Partition assigns every wallet to one exchange and counts it once. Follow the scan's supply units and inspect its wallet evidence.
Supply first funded through a privacy mixer or instant-swap.
Right next to CEX funding, this shows how much of the top-holder money arrived through a mixer or instant-swap service (ChangeNow, FixedFloat, THORChain…). Legitimate exchange withdrawals are traceable; mixer money is deliberately not — it's used to hide where the supply came from. A separate line calls out when the deployer's own wallet was funded that way.
Linked holdings, transfers and acquisition patterns.
Clusters bring related wallet observations together. Time nodes describe linked activity in a shared window. Shared funding, transfer links and acquisition timing help researchers investigate how a group formed and what it holds now.
Where the supply actually sits, and how the wallets are shaped.
Read top-holder concentration alongside wallet ages and trading history. Similar holdings or wallet ages can identify groups to investigate; they do not prove common control on their own. Identical Holdings lists wallet addresses and their shares; Wallet Age Groups adds the available group details.
Follow each panel's units. Wallet counts, ages, total-supply shares, and free-float shares describe different things and are not interchangeable.
What to inspect alongside the result.
| Evidence | Meaning and limitation |
|---|---|
| Exchange funding | Total traced share and its distribution across venues; exchange use alone does not prove independence or coordination. |
| Top-holder concentration | Supply held by the largest wallets. Compare holdings with pools, contracts and verified locks. |
| Wallet ages | When wallets became active. Similar ages can have ordinary explanations. |
| Linked groups | Wallet membership, holdings and transaction links. Overlapping detections are not independent evidence. |
| Shared fees | A common transaction setting; widely used defaults provide weaker evidence. |
| Coverage | What was read at scan time. Missing or partial data limits conclusions. |
The total and distribution across exchanges are considered alongside wallet and acquisition evidence. More exchange funding does not automatically mean a safer token. Inspect the measured shares and links; exact decision rules remain private.
It's the middle result: insider or exchange-routing coordination without the harder signs of bundling. Think of an unusual mix of exchanges funding the supply (several of the cabal signals above at the same time), linked wallets that move together, or a small number of wallets holding most of the float. It's a genuine caution — a signal that a coordinated group can move the coin — just a different, usually milder, pattern than Bundled. It is not a safety rating.
No. Organic means "no manipulation pattern found in the data we could check" — it is not a safety rating and not a price prediction. It's blue, not green, exactly so it doesn't read as a buy signal. A coin can be Organic and still lose most of its value, or Bundled and trade normally for a while. Always do your own research.
The analysis couldn't grade it — either there's no real market yet (almost no liquidity or holders), or exchange-funding data was unavailable so bundling couldn't be checked. Follow the retry time shown on the result. Repeated unavailable results normally back off from 5 minutes to 1 hour. Polling sooner does not justify another paid scan. If the coin is brand new, wait for trading history first.
A result reflects the on-chain data at scan time, not a permanent label. New trading, new holders, or corrected upstream data can move it. That's expected — re-scanning is how you get the current read.
No. Every result is an automated, algorithmic opinion from public on-chain data — not a finding of fact, a fraud certification, or a claim about anyone's intent. If a project disagrees, there's an appeal link on every result and on the methodology page.